Brasier Law

Oregon Family Law Attorney

  • Practice Areas
    • Uncontested Cases
    • Marriage & Divorce
      • Divorce
      • Uncontested Divorce
      • Contested and Uncontested Divorce
      • Modification to Orders
      • Property Distribution
      • Separation and Temporary Orders
      • Spousal Support
      • Support Orders
      • Tax Issues in Divorce
      • Financial Planning During and After Divorce
      • Division of Debt in Divorce
      • Business Division in Divorce
      • High Asset Divorce
      • Enforcement of Court Orders
    • Child Custody & Support
      • Adoption
      • Child Support
      • Move Aways and Out-of-State Custody Enforcement
    • Parental Rights
      • Custody and Parenting Time
      • Father’s Rights and Paternity
      • Grandparent Rights
      • Rights of UnMarried Parents
    • Domestic Violence & Abuse
      • Abusive Restraining Orders and FAPA
      • Domestic Violence
      • Estate Planning
      • False Accusations of Violence
      • Financial Abuse of Elders
      • Physical Abuse of Elders
      • Protective Orders
      • Restraining Orders During Divorce
      • Stalking Orders
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Attorney Tom Brasier
  • Articles
    • General Family Law Articles
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Child Custody and Support
    • Parental Rights
    • Domestic Violence and Abuse
    • Uncontested Divorce
  • Contact

Immediate Danger Temporary Custody Orders

March 2, 2017 by BrasierLaw

Immediate danger Custody orders in Oregon

The state of Oregon allows parties to obtain, in limited situations, an immediate custody order when the other parent presents a danger to the child.  If you feel you need such an order, you will have to convince a judge that the child is in immediate danger in the other person’s care.  You have to file a proper motion, along with an affidavit laying out the reasons for the danger, and you have to present these in person at an “ex parte” time.  You also have to have an existing custody or divorce case pending for this immediate danger order to exist underneath.

In most if not all situations, you also have to notify the other parent of what you are doing so they have an opportunity to appear and tell their side of the story.

These custody orders are designed for extreme situations, and are often overused by parents.  The language of the statute is simple, the child must be in “immediate danger”, and the danger must exist “at the time you file your motion”.  It is a good idea to consult with a custody attorney if you intend to seek such an order, if for no other reason than to be sure you don’t lose based on a technicality of some kind.

First Time Custody Cases Versus Modifications to an Old Custody Order

The amount of evidence you need is different if this is a first time custody case, versus a modification to an old order.

For people in their first round of litigation, meaning this is an original custody or divorce case, not a modification of an old order, the chances of success are better.  These are what we call “pre-judgment immediate danger orders”.  In a pre-judgment immediate danger order, your job is to convince a judge that the other parent poses such a threat, by what we family law attorneys call “a preponderance of the evidence”.  In simple terms, this means you need to convince the judge that it is “more likely than not” that what you’re saying is true.  In other words, if you can convince the judge that it is 51% likely you are telling the truth and the danger exists, and 49% likely there is no danger, then you would win.

It is a good idea to come to court prepared with whatever evidence, documents, or witnesses you have supporting the claim of danger.

However, when people are proceeding with a modification to an old order, they tend to have a harder time getting an immediate danger order.  If there is a prior custody order in place, then you would seek to get what is called a “post-judgment immediate danger order”.  The only real difference here worth discussing is that you have to prove the danger exists by what is called “clear and convincing evidence”.

Basically, for people who have already gone through a custody case, they make it intentionally harder for someone to get such an immediate danger order.  “Clear and convincing” doesn’t have as precise a definition, but it basically means you need some pretty solid evidence.  This is up to the judge’s interpretation somewhat, but it basically means you need to convince a judge more strongly than just the 51/49% we discussed for the pre-judgment orders.

Clackamas, Oregon Family Law Attorney Tom Brasier
Tom Brasier is an experienced Portland family law attorney focused on providing high quality work tailored to meet your needs. He provides divorce, custody, restraining order, and other family law services to the greater Portland, Oregon and SW Washington areas. You can reach him by calling 1 (503) 855-4777 or by using the form below.

We are now on social media, follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Pinterest.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Child Custody and Support, General Family Law, Marriage and Divorce Family Law, Protective Family Law custody, Custody orders, Divorce, Family law, Immediate danger custody orders, Oregon Custody, Oregon Custody Attorney

Contact Us

Latest News

  • 5 Common Misconceptions About Mediation
  • What is Oregon Compensatory Spousal Support and am I Entitled to it?
  • Four Misconceptions About Oregon Divorce
  • How Much Does an Oregon Divorce Cost?
  • Helpful Hints for Getting Divorced During Covid-19

© 2014 by Brasier Law, LLC Disclaimer | Site Map

Copyright © 2025 · Handcrafted by Workshed